Dr. Tess Lawrie and Bret Weinstein

In this podcast with Brett Weinstein (Dark Horse Podcast), Dr. Tess Lawrie defends the groundbreaking meta-analysis study on Ivermectin and its implications.
Tess Lawrie is an MD and PHD, external analyst for the World Health Organization, and an expert in analysis of medical evidence.
Thank you to Tess Lawrie, Pierre Koury and other doctors and researchers who are trying to get Ivermectin approved for use in treatment in covid-19. Also thanks to people like Brett Weinsten who are doing their best to publicize info on ivermectin. It is criminal in my view that this information is being suppressed.
It is crucial that the lay person be able to understand scientific methods of deriving evidence significance. A short video similar to this…https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i675gZNe3MY
Scientific is not correct word to use. Meta analysis, is as the video states, the best guess of experts.
Of course, this is necessary when we have poor data on a complex problem. It is often difficult to isolate and control factors and get clear observations in medical research.
The judgement of experts can be good or poor, but it is not really science.
To me this is a real problem today, experts calling their opinion “the science”
DOCTORS IN AUSTRALIA ARE TOO SCARED TO PRESCRIBE IVERMECTIN AND ALL PHARMACIES ‘ ARE SUDDENLY OUT OF STOCK.’ MIGHT HAVE TO ASK MY VET TO GIVE ME PRESCRIPTION FOR MY HORSE!!
They say Ivermectin is for horses.
so if you drink milk you are drinking cat food
To date billions of people around the world have been vaccinated so we have more than sufficient data to determine the efficacy and safety of COVID vaccines. The unvaccinated have roughly 1:100 chances of dying from the disease whereas the vaccinated have roughly 1:1,000,000 chances of dying. I know which odds I prefer.
ZIGGY
Doctors are not authorised to prescribe Ivermectin for COVID in Australia because there are, as yet, no credible or reliable random controlled clinical trials showing its efficacy. Until the evidence changes this is the correct and responsible position to take.
Reading your article helped me a lot and I agree with you. But I still have some doubts, can you clarify for me? I’ll keep an eye out for your answers.
I’ve been browsing online greater than 3 hours as of late, but I never found any interesting article like yours.It is lovely worth sufficient for me. In my view, if all site owners and bloggers made excellent content as you probably did, thenet will probably be much more useful than ever before.
Very nice post. I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I’ve really enjoyed browsing your blog posts. In any case I’ll be subscribing to your feed and I hope you write again soon!
Do you mind if I quote a couple of your articles as long asI provide credit and sources back to your website?My blog site is in the very same niche as yours and my users would certainly benefit from some of the information you present here.Please let me know if this okay with you. Thanks!
I have read your article carefully and I agree with you very much. So, do you allow me to do this? I want to share your article link to my website: gate io
Reading your article has greatly helped me, and I agree with you. But I still have some questions. Can you help me? I will pay attention to your answer. thank you.